Gill Gerhardi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Bercow MP
House of Commons
Westminster
LONDON. SWIA OAA
15th July 04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Mr. Bercow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for
your letter of the 12th July laying out your position
on the Mental Capacity Bill prior to our meeting at your Aston
Clinton Surgery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To answer your
points in order |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Problems Advanced Directives and Living
Wills
|
Whilst Advanced
Directives and Living Wills maybe a way for patients to make
their wishes known and take back some of the power and responsibility
for their treatment. However there are too many situations that
Advanced Directives and Living Wills are supposed to deal with
that they cannot hope to deal with every possibility that might
arise. This means that Advanced Directives and Living Wills get
written in such general terms that they are full of holes and
are therefore ripe for misinterpretation and abuse |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most people
don't know what they are going to feel like if something happens
to them. If they get decisions put into something like a Living
Will they may well change their minds if it actually happens.
That is OK if their verbal wishes are given the same weight and
legality as those they wrote down in front of a Solicitor or
witnesses but I fear that that might be problematic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
According to
the Mental Capacity Bill, Advanced Directives can only be used
negatively to say what you don't want to happen to you. I want
to say what I want to happen. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You say that
right is safeguarded in law already. According to the GMC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Withholding
or withdrawing of treatment including nutrition and hydration
According to the GMC Guidelines the law states that |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- An act where the doctor's primary intention
is to bring about a patient's death would be unlawful.
|
|
|
- Withholding or withdrawing treatment is
regarded in law as an 'omission' not an 'act'.
|
|
|
- In the case of patients in a permanent
vegetative state (PVS), artificial nutrition and hydration constitute
medical treatment and may be lawfully withdrawn in certain circumstances
However, in practice, a court declaration should be obtained.
|
|
- Final responsibility rests with the doctor
to decide what treatments are clinically indicated and should
be provided to the patient, subject to a competent patient's
consent or, in the case of an incompetent patient, any known
views of that patient prior to becoming incapacitated and taking
account of the views offered by those close to the patient
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These
appear to back up your position that no deaths are precipitated
without court sanction. Yet what appears to be happening in reality
is somewhat different. The Withholding or withdrawing of treatment
including nutrition and hydration is certainly not only happening
after a court decision. According to the Libdems, who voted at
their Spring Conference this year for medically assisted suicide
and lost my vote as a result, a paper published in The Lancet
said that there are 18,000 medically assisted deaths per year
in the UK. Although I haven't been able to see the Lancet article
and don't know how that figure was reached, the number of cases
and complaints about the worst cases that reach the media suggest
that that figure is probably not far from the truth. I've included
some reports in your pack. Many can only be regarded as anecdotal
but you only have to talk to nurses working on geriatric wards
to find out how prevalent the practice is. As a disabled person
Jane Campbell's article is particularly harrowing
to me which is also in you pack. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While doctors are allowed
to withhold and withdraw treatment including nutrition and hydration
from anyone regardless of their mental capacity, patients who
are fully capable seem to be being sedated to take away that
capability before `treatment' is withdrawn, any legislation condoning
such practices is likely to let the whole practice escalate. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Further Concerns
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Best Interest -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bill says. "Everything
that is done for a person who lacks capacity must be in that
person's best interests. The Bill provides a checklist of factors
that decision-makers must work through in deciding what is in
a person's best interests. The person themselves - their wishes
and feelings - and their participation are key. Also, carers
and family members gain a right to be consulted." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regardless of the Bill's
intentions what is in a patient's best interest will boil down
to subjective value judgements of all those consulted. Doctors
already use quality of life judgements to make life and death
decisions for their patients on a daily basis and because many
don't come across severely disabled people I suspect that early
death is `prescribed' for many people with physical and mental
disabilities as if they were terminally ill. Someone's quality
of life or best interest cannot objectively be decided without
the deciding person putting their own personal feelings about
how they would feel in that situation into it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the `FULL REGULATORY
IMPACT ASSESSMENT' of The Mental Capacity Bill there
is a breakdown of costs imposed on different sections of society
by the bill but there appears to be no real understanding of. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a. |
The lack of time health professionals
have in their normal working lives. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b. |
How much real time it takes
to communicate effectively with people with learning or communication
disabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c. |
The lack of real continuity
of care there is in hospitals which is what people with diminished
capacity need to feel relaxed and more able to cope. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
promotion of advocacy in the Bill and the voluntary sector may
help solve some of these problems in the longer term. The remit
of the bill should be giving these very vulnerable people the
best possible environment to use whatever capacity they have.
It simply isn't doing that at present. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have included in your pack
an
article that graphically illustrate how attitudes towards
disabled people mean that we are drawn into the catchment of,
and are badly affected by, legislation that was not meant to
be aimed at us at all. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am glad that you don't
like the idea of anything that would legalise euthanasia. However,
I'm afraid that since I sent out my `Against Assisted Dying'
booklets the overwhelming evidence has forced me to accept that
euthanasia is already sanctioned in the UK. I will avoid further
Hospital stays like the plague. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yours sincerely |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gill Gerhardi |
|
|